agentskills.legal
Back to Skills

Escheatment and Unclaimed Property Policy

Drafts a comprehensive Escheatment and Unclaimed Property Policy as an authoritative governance document for managing dormant accounts and unclaimed property across US states. Conducts research on internal organizational documents and state-specific escheat laws, including dormancy periods, due diligence, notices, and reporting requirements. Use for financial services organizations establishing compliance frameworks to avoid penalties, audits, and interest assessments.

regulatorydraftingresearchmemosenior level

Enhanced Prompt: Escheatment and Unclaimed Property Policy

You are tasked with drafting a comprehensive Escheatment and Unclaimed Property Policy that serves as the authoritative governance document for managing dormant accounts and abandoned property across all applicable state jurisdictions. This policy must ensure full compliance with varying state escheat laws while establishing robust, defensible procedures for identifying, reporting, and remitting unclaimed property to appropriate state authorities.

Before beginning the drafting process, conduct thorough research to inform the policy's development. Search through any uploaded organizational documents to identify existing policies, procedures, or past unclaimed property reports that may provide context about the organization's current practices, property types held, jurisdictional footprint, and historical compliance challenges. Review any available compliance manuals, audit reports, or correspondence with state unclaimed property administrators to understand the organization's specific risk profile and regulatory history. If the organization operates in specific industries such as financial services, insurance, utilities, or retail, search for industry-specific guidance and best practices that should be incorporated into the policy framework.

Supplement your document research with targeted external research on current state escheat law requirements. Identify the most recent statutory changes and regulatory guidance from key jurisdictions where the organization operates or holds significant amounts of potentially dormant property. Pay particular attention to states that have recently amended their unclaimed property statutes or increased enforcement activity, as these jurisdictions may require enhanced compliance measures. Research current dormancy period requirements across all relevant states for each category of property the organization holds, including bank accounts, uncashed checks, securities, insurance proceeds, customer credits, gift certificates, and any industry-specific property types. Investigate current due diligence thresholds, notice requirements, and reporting deadlines for each applicable jurisdiction to ensure the policy reflects accurate, up-to-date legal requirements.

Policy Purpose and Governance Framework

Draft an authoritative purpose statement that establishes this policy as the organization's definitive framework for escheatment compliance. The purpose section should articulate that this policy exists to ensure systematic compliance with the unclaimed property laws of all states where the organization conducts business or holds property belonging to others. Explain that the policy serves multiple critical functions: protecting the organization from significant financial penalties, interest assessments, and audit exposure; fulfilling the organization's legal obligation to safeguard owner property and facilitate reunification; and establishing clear accountability for compliance activities across all business units and operational functions.

The purpose statement must acknowledge the complex, multi-jurisdictional nature of escheat compliance, noting that the organization may be subject to the laws of all fifty states plus the District of Columbia and certain U.S. territories, each with distinct requirements for dormancy periods, property classifications, due diligence, and reporting. Emphasize that this policy provides a unified, enterprise-wide approach to managing these varying requirements while allowing for jurisdiction-specific procedures where necessary. Include a clear statement that compliance with this policy is mandatory for all employees, departments, and business units that handle, maintain, or have custody of property that may become subject to escheatment.

Establish the governance structure for policy oversight, designating a specific role or department (such as the Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, or Compliance Officer) as the policy owner with ultimate accountability for escheatment compliance. Specify that this policy owner has authority to interpret policy provisions, resolve compliance questions, approve exceptions when legally permissible, and coordinate responses to state audits or inquiries. Detail the roles and responsibilities of other key stakeholders, including business unit managers who must implement identification procedures, accounting personnel who prepare reports and remittances, legal counsel who provide regulatory guidance, and internal audit functions that verify compliance. Establish a requirement for annual policy review and update to reflect legislative changes, operational modifications, or lessons learned from compliance activities.

Comprehensive Property Identification Procedures

Develop detailed, systematic procedures for identifying all categories of unclaimed property across the organization's operations. The identification process must be proactive, comprehensive, and conducted with sufficient frequency to ensure timely compliance with reporting obligations. Establish that each business unit or department holding property belonging to others must implement regular monitoring protocols tailored to the specific property types under their control and the volume of potentially dormant items.

For financial accounts including checking accounts, savings accounts, certificates of deposit, and other deposit accounts, specify that the organization must conduct at least quarterly reviews to identify accounts that have had no owner-initiated contact or activity for periods approaching the applicable dormancy threshold. Define what constitutes owner-initiated activity that resets the dormancy period, such as deposits, withdrawals, account inquiries, written correspondence, or online banking access, while clarifying that bank-initiated activities like interest credits, fee assessments, or automated statements do not constitute owner contact. Establish procedures for tracking the last date of owner contact for each account and flagging accounts that are within six months of reaching dormancy to allow adequate time for due diligence.

For accounts payable and uncashed checks, including vendor payments, payroll checks, customer refunds, and rebate checks, detail procedures for identifying outstanding items that remain uncashed beyond the applicable dormancy period. Specify that the organization must maintain records of all issued checks and conduct regular reconciliation of outstanding items, with particular attention to payroll checks which typically have shorter dormancy periods (often one to three years) than other check types. Address the treatment of stale-dated checks and establish clear procedures for determining when the dormancy period begins, typically the date the check was issued or the date it became payable.

For securities-related property including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, dividends, interest payments, and distributions, establish procedures for identifying owners who cannot be located or who have failed to cash dividend checks, respond to correspondence, or conduct any activity in their accounts. Detail the process for monitoring both the underlying securities and any cash distributions that remain unclaimed, noting that these may have different dormancy periods and reporting requirements. Address the treatment of securities held in street name, dividend reinvestment plans, and fractional shares resulting from corporate actions.

For customer credits, overpayments, and deposits, specify procedures for identifying amounts owed to customers that remain unclaimed beyond the dormancy period. This includes utility deposits, insurance premium overpayments, credit balances on customer accounts, and any other amounts where the organization holds funds belonging to customers or clients. Establish protocols for distinguishing between amounts that represent true unclaimed property and amounts that may be subject to other legal treatment such as contract provisions or regulatory requirements specific to the organization's industry.

For gift certificates, stored value cards, and customer loyalty programs, address the complex legal landscape surrounding these instruments, noting that many states have enacted specific exemptions or special rules for gift cards and that federal law (the Credit CARD Act) prohibits expiration dates shorter than five years for certain gift certificates. Detail procedures for tracking unredeemed balances, determining which state's law applies based on the purchaser's address or the location of sale, and calculating the reportable amount when cards have been partially redeemed or are subject to dormancy fees where legally permitted.

Establish procedures for identifying any other property types specific to the organization's operations, such as insurance policy proceeds, annuity payments, safe deposit box contents, mineral proceeds, royalty payments, or trust distributions. For each property type, specify the systems and databases that must be queried, the criteria for flagging potentially dormant property, and the personnel responsible for conducting reviews. Include provisions for identifying property that may be exempt from escheatment under state law, such as certain government obligations, property below statutory de minimis thresholds where applicable, or property subject to valid liens or other legal claims.

Dormancy Period Determination and Jurisdictional Analysis

Create a comprehensive framework for accurately determining and applying dormancy periods across all property types and state jurisdictions. This framework must address the fundamental challenge that dormancy periods vary significantly by state and property type, ranging from one year to fifteen years depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the property, with most common periods falling between three and five years.

Establish that the organization must maintain a current, detailed matrix or reference schedule that documents the specific dormancy period for each category of property in each state where the organization may have reporting obligations. This schedule must be maintained by the policy owner or designated compliance personnel and updated at least annually, or more frequently when the organization becomes aware of legislative changes affecting dormancy periods. The schedule should organize information by property type (such as demand deposits, time deposits, wages, uncashed checks, securities, insurance proceeds, and other categories) and by state jurisdiction, providing quick reference for compliance personnel determining when property must be reported.

Detail the process for determining which state's law applies to each item of unclaimed property, as this jurisdictional determination is fundamental to proper compliance. Explain that states generally follow a priority system established by the Supreme Court's decisions in Texas v. New Jersey and Pennsylvania v. New York, which created a hierarchy for determining the state entitled to receive unclaimed property. Under this framework, property is generally reportable to the state of the owner's last known address as reflected in the organization's records. If no address is known or if the address is outside the United States, property is typically reportable to the state of the holder's incorporation or principal place of business, depending on the property type and specific state statutes.

Establish procedures for maintaining accurate address records and conducting address verification when necessary to ensure proper jurisdictional determination. Specify that the organization must use the last known address in its records, which is typically the most recent address provided by the owner through correspondence, account documentation, or other reliable means. Address the treatment of property where the owner's address is unknown, incomplete, or invalid, noting that such property is generally reportable to the organization's state of incorporation for intangible property or the state where the property was held for tangible property.

Detail special jurisdictional rules that apply to specific property types. For example, explain that wages and payroll are typically reportable to the state of the employee's last known address, while insurance proceeds may be reportable to the state of the insured's last known address. Securities and related distributions may follow different rules depending on whether the owner's address is known and whether the securities are held directly or through intermediaries. Address the treatment of property held for business entities, which may be reportable based on the entity's state of incorporation or principal place of business rather than a physical address.

Include provisions for handling situations where state laws conflict or where the organization receives claims from multiple states for the same property. Establish that the organization will follow the priority rules established by case law and statute, document its jurisdictional analysis, and seek legal counsel when facing complex jurisdictional questions. Specify procedures for participating in multi-state compliance programs or voluntary disclosure agreements that may provide alternative frameworks for resolving jurisdictional uncertainties.

Due Diligence and Owner Contact Requirements

Establish rigorous due diligence procedures that satisfy state law requirements for attempting to contact apparent owners before property is reported and remitted to the state. Due diligence serves the critical purpose of providing owners with notice and opportunity to claim their property before it is transferred to state custody, and failure to conduct proper due diligence can result in penalties and increased audit scrutiny.

Detail that most states require holders to send written notice to apparent owners when the value of the property exceeds a specified threshold, typically ranging from fifty to two hundred fifty dollars, though some states require notice regardless of value or have different thresholds for different property types. The notice must be sent to the owner's last known address within a specified timeframe before the reporting deadline, commonly between sixty and one hundred twenty days prior to the report due date, though some states require notice up to two hundred forty days in advance.

Specify the required content of due diligence letters, which must generally include a clear statement that the organization is holding property belonging to the owner, a description of the property sufficient for the owner to identify it (such as account number, property type, and approximate value), instructions for claiming the property directly from the organization, a deadline by which the owner must respond to prevent the property from being reported to the state, and contact information for the organization's unclaimed property compliance personnel. The notice should be written in clear, plain language that a layperson can understand and should avoid legal jargon or threatening language that might discourage owner response.

Establish procedures for documenting all due diligence efforts with sufficient detail to demonstrate compliance during state audits. Documentation must include copies of all notices sent, the dates of mailing, the addresses used, records of any returned mail with postal service notations, copies of owner responses received, and records of any property successfully returned to owners as a result of due diligence. Specify that documentation must be maintained in accordance with the organization's recordkeeping requirements and must be readily retrievable for audit purposes.

Address the treatment of returned mail, which presents both challenges and opportunities for enhanced compliance. When due diligence letters are returned as undeliverable, establish procedures for conducting reasonable additional efforts to locate the owner, which may include searching updated address databases, using address verification services, reviewing other accounts or records the owner may have with the organization, or conducting internet searches for contact information. Some states require or encourage such enhanced due diligence efforts, particularly for high-value property, and conducting these additional searches demonstrates good faith compliance efforts that may be viewed favorably during audits.

Detail procedures for handling owner responses received during the due diligence period. When owners respond to due diligence notices and claim their property, establish clear protocols for verifying the owner's identity, processing the claim, and documenting the reunification. Specify the documentation required to verify ownership, such as government-issued identification, account statements, or other evidence establishing the claimant's right to the property. Address the treatment of partial claims, disputed ownership, and situations where multiple parties claim the same property.

Include provisions for handling responses received after the due diligence period has closed but before the property has been remitted to the state. Establish that the organization should make reasonable efforts to return property to verified owners even after the reporting deadline has passed, as this serves the ultimate purpose of reuniting owners with their property and may reduce the organization's reporting obligations. Specify procedures for amending reports when property is returned to owners after initial reporting but before remittance.

Reporting, Remittance, and Filing Procedures

Develop comprehensive procedures for preparing, reviewing, and submitting annual unclaimed property reports to each applicable state jurisdiction and remitting the associated property or cash value. The reporting process is the culmination of the organization's annual compliance cycle and must be executed with precision to avoid penalties, interest charges, and audit exposure.

Establish an annual compliance calendar that identifies all critical deadlines and milestones for the reporting process. Note that state reporting deadlines vary significantly, with most states requiring reports between March 1st and November 1st for property that became reportable during the previous calendar year, though some states use fiscal year reporting periods or have unique deadline structures. The compliance calendar should work backward from each state's filing deadline to establish internal milestones for property identification, due diligence completion, report preparation, internal review and approval, and final submission.

Detail the process for compiling all property that has reached the end of its dormancy period during the reporting year. This compilation must aggregate property by state jurisdiction based on the jurisdictional analysis described earlier, organize property by type according to each state's reporting categories, and calculate the total value of property to be reported to each state. Specify that the compilation process must include verification procedures to ensure accuracy, such as reconciliation of reported amounts to underlying accounting records, verification that all required property types have been included, and confirmation that dormancy periods have been correctly applied.

Establish procedures for preparing reports in the format required by each state, which may include electronic filing through state-specific systems, submission of standardized NAUPA (National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators) format files, completion of state-specific forms, or use of multi-state reporting platforms. Detail the data elements that must be included for each item of property, typically including owner name and last known address, property description and type, date of last contact or activity, property value, and any other information required by state law such as social security numbers, account numbers, or relationship codes.

Address the calculation and reporting of interest or other amounts due when required by state law. Some states require holders to remit interest on certain types of property calculated from the date the property should have been reported, while other states do not require interest from holders. Establish procedures for determining when interest is required, calculating the appropriate amount using the rate and methodology specified by state law, and including interest in the total remittance.

Specify procedures for internal review and approval of reports before submission. Establish that all reports must be reviewed by appropriate personnel, such as accounting managers, compliance officers, or legal counsel, to verify accuracy and completeness. Detail the approval authority required for report submission, typically requiring sign-off from senior financial or legal personnel who can attest to the accuracy of the reports and the adequacy of the organization's compliance procedures.

Detail the methods and procedures for remitting property to states, which may include electronic funds transfer for cash property, delivery of securities in certificate or book-entry form, or physical delivery of tangible property such as safe deposit box contents. Establish that remittances must be made in accordance with each state's requirements and within the timeframes specified by law, typically concurrent with or shortly after report submission. Include procedures for obtaining and retaining confirmation of remittance, such as wire transfer confirmations, delivery receipts, or state acknowledgment letters.

Address the preparation and submission of amended reports when errors or omissions are discovered after initial filing. Establish that the organization will promptly file amended reports when it becomes aware of material errors, additional property that should have been reported, or other circumstances requiring correction. Detail the process for determining when amended reports are necessary, obtaining appropriate approvals, and submitting corrections to states in accordance with their amendment procedures.

Include provisions for voluntary disclosure agreements and compliance programs for addressing past non-compliance. When the organization discovers that it has failed to report property in prior years, establish procedures for evaluating whether to pursue voluntary disclosure, which may provide benefits such as reduced look-back periods, penalty waivers, or interest relief. Detail the process for engaging legal counsel to evaluate voluntary disclosure options, preparing disclosure submissions, and negotiating agreements with states.

Recordkeeping, Audit Preparedness, and Continuous Improvement

Establish comprehensive recordkeeping requirements that ensure the organization maintains complete, organized, and accessible documentation of all unclaimed property activities for the full period required by law and sound business practice. Proper recordkeeping is essential for demonstrating compliance during state audits, responding to owner claims, and supporting the organization's defense against allegations of non-compliance.

Specify that records must be retained for a minimum period as required by the most stringent applicable state law, which typically ranges from seven to ten years from the date of reporting, though some states may require longer retention or permanent retention of certain records. Note that because state audits may examine records going back ten years or more from the audit commencement date, the organization should consider retaining records for at least ten years and potentially longer for high-risk jurisdictions or property types.

Detail the categories of records that must be maintained in a complete and organized manner. Original property records must be retained showing owner identification information, last known addresses, property descriptions, transaction histories, dates of last owner contact or activity, and any other information necessary to verify that property was correctly identified and reported. Due diligence documentation must include copies of all notices sent to owners, mailing dates and addresses, returned mail with postal notations, owner responses, and records of property returned to owners. Reporting documentation must include copies of all filed reports, remittance confirmations, state acknowledgment letters, correspondence with state unclaimed property administrators, and documentation of any amended reports or voluntary disclosures.

Establish procedures for maintaining records in both physical and electronic formats, ensuring that records remain accessible, retrievable, and readable throughout the retention period. Address the challenges of maintaining electronic records as systems change, specifying that the organization must ensure continued access to historical data even when legacy systems are retired or replaced. Include provisions for backing up electronic records, protecting records from unauthorized access or alteration, and maintaining audit trails showing when records were created, modified, or accessed.

Detail procedures for responding to state audits, which represent a significant compliance risk and require careful preparation and management. Establish that the organization will designate an audit coordinator, typically from the finance, legal, or compliance department, who will serve as the primary point of contact with state auditors and coordinate the organization's response. Specify that the audit coordinator has authority to request records from business units, engage external counsel or consultants when necessary, and coordinate with senior management on audit strategy and settlement negotiations.

Include procedures for the initial audit notification and scoping phase, during which the organization will provide preliminary information about its operations, property types, and compliance history. Detail the process for responding to auditor requests for records, establishing that the organization will provide requested documents in an organized, timely manner while ensuring that privileged materials are appropriately protected. Specify procedures for conducting entrance conferences, periodic status meetings, and exit conferences with auditors.

Address the treatment of audit findings and assessments, establishing procedures for reviewing auditor work papers, challenging findings that the organization believes are incorrect, and negotiating settlements when appropriate. Specify that the organization will engage legal counsel to review significant audit assessments and advise on response strategies. Include provisions for appealing audit findings through administrative or judicial processes when the organization has strong legal or factual grounds for challenging the assessment.

Establish a continuous improvement framework that uses audit results, compliance challenges, and industry developments to enhance the organization's unclaimed property program. Specify that the policy owner must conduct an annual review of the organization's compliance activities, identifying areas where procedures should be strengthened, additional training is needed, or policy revisions are warranted. Detail procedures for communicating policy updates to affected personnel, providing training on new requirements, and verifying that changes have been effectively implemented.

Include provisions for monitoring legislative and regulatory developments that may affect the organization's compliance obligations. Establish that the policy owner or designated compliance personnel will monitor proposed legislation in key jurisdictions, participate in industry associations or working groups focused on unclaimed property issues, and maintain awareness of enforcement trends and audit priorities. Specify that the organization will assess the impact of legal changes and update its procedures accordingly, ensuring that the compliance program remains current and effective.

Throughout the policy drafting process, ensure that all provisions are written in clear, precise language that can be understood and implemented by personnel across the organization. Use defined terms consistently, provide examples where helpful to illustrate complex concepts, and organize the policy in a logical structure that facilitates reference and use. The final policy should serve as both a compliance manual for day-to-day operations and a governance document that demonstrates the organization's commitment to meeting its legal obligations in this complex and evolving area of law.